================
@@ -227,7 +265,7 @@ class ThreadPool {
class ThreadPoolTaskGroup {
----------------
aganea wrote:
That point was raised by the OP in the Discourse thread (allow for custom
implementations of `ThreadPoolTaskGroup`) and I think it deserved a clear
answer, and I do agree now to your point. Until there's no clear use-case, the
behavior of `ThreadPoolTaskGroup` will remain as is, deferred to the
`ThreadPool` implementation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/82094
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
