labath wrote: > @Michael137 suggested that I check that performance of `FindDirectNestedType` > doesn't regress (at least for my use case), since I have custom > instrumentation in my formatter. I can confirm that 3 versions of this > function (#68705, #74786, and this PR) exhibit the same level of performance. > Raw numbers (in nanoseconds) fluctuate a lot, but I don't see anything > concerning: > > ``` > This PR > ------- > 2,611,025 > 1,988,893 > 2,878,981 > 1,873,220 > > main branch (#74786) > ---- > 1,973,071 > 2,542,073 > 1,509,624 > > Initial implementation (#68705) > ------ > 2,029,233 > 2,477,041 > 1,315,462 > ```
Cool. Thanks for confirming that. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/89183 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
