clayborg wrote: > > I forgot to ask, what is the motivation behind this change? Is there > > something you can't do with the SBAPI right now or that is better expressed > > with SBAddressRange and SBAddressRangeList? > > Yes, I want to add the following API: > > lldb::SBError SBProcess::FindInMemory(const SBAddressRangeList &ranges, const > void *buf, uint64_t size, SBAddressRangeList &matches, size_t alignment);
Yeah, we have no `SBProcess::FindMemory()` API, but we do have a "memory find" command. We want to expose simple memory finds, and complex ones like above: ``` addr_t SBProcess::FindInMemory(SBAddressRange &range, const void *buf, uint64_t size, size_t alignment); SBError SBProcess::FindInMemory(const SBAddressRangeList &ranges, const void *buf, uint64_t size, SBAddressRangeList &matches, size_t alignment); ``` We then want to plumb this through to the lldb_private::Process plug-ins so we can allow plug-ins to do things more efficiently. Mostly for core files where we could parallelize the memory search. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92014 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
