jimingham wrote: LGTM.
We do offer SBValue::GetDescription, which uses a default DumpValueObjectOptions. So it would be entirely reasonable to make an SBValueObjectDescriptionOptions (or maybe a shorter name?) and add SBValue::GetDescription(SBValueObjectDescriptionOptions) API. But people can also cons up an equivalent Dump on their own using the other SBValue API's, so leaving the GetDescription as it is and doing the testing on the side like this is also fine. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93158 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
