DavidSpickett wrote: There is a comment in this function: ``` // Try to find an exact match for the value. // At the same time, we're applying a heuristic to determine whether we want // to print this enum as a bitfield. We're likely dealing with a bitfield if // every enumerator is either a one bit value or a superset of the previous // enumerators. Also 0 doesn't make sense when the enumerators are used as // flags. ``` The last sentence is ambiguous, but I think it refers to *enumerators* of 0, not the value being 0. If I'm wrong, I haven't found any other clues as to why printing nothing for a value of 0x0 makes sense. I think it's just an oversight.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97557 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
