jimingham wrote: I agree with Pavel, we don't for most purposes care whether there's a symbol at the start address (for instance we can use it for the "expression evaluation return breakpoint" as an address. So we shouldn't require the symbol.
Jim > On Jul 22, 2024, at 12:04 AM, Pavel Labath ***@***.***> wrote: > > > I'd like to note that, at least in the ELF world, there's no guarantee that > there will be an actual symbol at the address where the process starts > executing. The convention is to call this _start but nothing in the system > actually relies on that. The ELF header contains the address of the first > instruction, the OS jumps to that, and that's it. > > So, I think that a more generic interface would be to return an Address > (which the caller can try to resolve to a symbol if it wants to). > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99673#issuecomment-2242235585>, or > unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ADUPVW7ZFE2ZXN3SJI7ZSMTZNSVILAVCNFSM6AAAAABLE7M55SVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDENBSGIZTKNJYGU>. > You are receiving this because you are on a team that was mentioned. > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99673 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
