================
@@ -1085,6 +1085,19 @@ std::string 
VariableDescription::GetResult(llvm::StringRef context) {
   return description.trim().str();
 }
 
+lldb::addr_t GetMemoryReference(lldb::SBValue v) {
+  if (!v.GetType().IsPointerType() && !v.GetType().IsArrayType()) {
+    return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+  }
+
+  lldb::SBValue deref = v.Dereference();
+  if (!deref.IsValid()) {
+    return LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS;
+  }
+
+  return deref.GetLoadAddress();
----------------
vogelsgesang wrote:

I addressed the stylistic parts of this comment (`std::optional`, don't check 
if `Derefence()` succeeded, ...).

I am not 100% sure regarding the proposed semantic changes, though, in 
particular about

```
if (v_type.IsPointerType() || v_type.IsReferenceType())
    v = v.Dereference();
```

This change would lead to a test case failure in the newly added memory tests. 
The `int not_a_ptr` would now have a memory reference associated. To my 
understanding of the intended debugging semantics of the DAP, it should not 
have an associated memory reference, though, since it is not a pointer or 
pointer-like type

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/104317
_______________________________________________
lldb-commits mailing list
lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits

Reply via email to