labath wrote: > Let me know if you guys don't want this patch in. I will closed it and apply > it to our local branch. @jasonmolenda @labath
Without claiming official authority to make this decision, I'm going to say that *I* don't think this is a good idea, because the patch is very (and IMO, unnecessarily) specific to post mortem processes. My (currently WIP) patch (#104193) gets you most of the speed benefits, works with live processes as well and it does that without introducing any new APIs. What you do downstream is up to you, but I would encourage you to wait for me to finish up that patch, as this doesn't look like something that would be a good idea to carry downstream (I certainly wouldn't want to do it). https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102536 _______________________________________________ lldb-commits mailing list lldb-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-commits
