Hi William, Thanks so much for testing! Very much appreciated!
Applied both patches as r109327. Take care, Steve William Lynch <[email protected]> writes: > The previous patch will allow lldb to finish building. However, on 10.5, I get > a linker error at startup time. It's missing > source/Plugins/Process/MacOSX-User > in lldb.dylib. However, at least on my machine, that subdirectory needs some > work to properly compile. > > Index: source/Plugins/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- source/Plugins/Makefile (revision 109318) > +++ source/Plugins/Makefile (working copy) > @@ -18,7 +18,8 @@ > > ifeq ($(HOST_OS),Darwin) > DIRS += DynamicLoader/MacOSX-DYLD ObjectContainer/Universal-Mach-O \ > - ObjectFile/Mach-O Process/gdb-remote Process/Utility SymbolVendor/MacOSX > + ObjectFile/Mach-O Process/gdb-remote Process/Utility SymbolVendor/MacOSX \ > + Process/MacOSX-User > endif > > ifeq ($(HOST_OS),Linux) > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 10:37 PM, William Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > A very small patch which should help building on Darwin: > > Index: lib/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- lib/Makefile (revision 109318) > +++ lib/Makefile (working copy) > @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ > lldbPluginObjectFileMachO.a \ > lldbPluginProcessGDBRemote.a \ > lldbPluginUtility.a \ > - lldbSymbolVendorMaxOSX.a > + lldbPluginSymbolVendorMacOSX.a > endif > > ifeq ($(HOST_OS),Linux) > > > On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Stephen Wilson <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just pushed the new linux process plugin. A few notes: > > I updated the makefiles to build only under linux. I do not know if > this will build on a mac. Perhaps someone can try and let me know the > result. > > Only very basic breakpoint/step-over functionality is present. For > example, we cannot resolve pending breakpoints yet, so one must set > breakpoints with the debugee stopped on entry. > > Only x86_64 at the moment (will add i386 soon). > > Here is a simple example of what is working for those who might like > to > test it out: > > === > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > === > > cat ctest.c > > void foo() { return; } > > void bar() { return; } > > int main() > { > foo(); > bar(); > return 0; > } > > > lldb ./ctest > Current executable set to './ctest' (x86_64). > (lldb) r -s > Launching '/home/steve/tmp/ctest' (x86_64) > (lldb) Process 0 Launching > Process 0 Stopped > * thread #1: tid = 0x4789, pc = 0x0000003206200af0, ... > (lldb) b s -n foo > Breakpoint created: 1: name = 'foo', locations = 1, resolved = 1 > (lldb) b s -n bar > Breakpoint created: 2: name = 'bar', locations = 1, resolved = 1 > (lldb) p c > Resuming process 0 > (lldb) Process 0 Stopped > * thread #1: tid = 0x4789, pc = 0x0000000000400478, ... > 1 > 2 -> void foo() { return; } > 3 > 4 void bar() { return; } > 5 > (lldb) p c > Resuming process 0 > (lldb) Process 0 Stopped > * thread #1: tid = 0x4789, pc = 0x000000000040047e, ... > 1 > 2 void foo() { return; } > 3 > 4 -> void bar() { return; } > 5 > 6 int main() > 7 { > (lldb) q > === > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > === > > > It's a start. Let be know of any issues, comments, advice, etc. > > Thanks! > Steve > _______________________________________________ > lldb-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
