Le 1 déc. 2011 à 19:52, Greg Clayton a écrit :

> It was this way after misinterpreting what the GPLv2 version of GDB does (our 
> darwin version) with the response. So it has been wrong for a while and does 
> need to be fixed.
> 
> We need to add a new packet that gets information about the process 
> (something like "qProcessInfo") that is being debugging in the case where we 
> attach by name and need to know the process ID of what we attached to.

Isn't what qGetPid already does ? 



> On Dec 1, 2011, at 8:51 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>> 
>> I'm actually studying the debugserver, and I have a qestion about 
>> implementation of the qC (get current thread ID) handler.
>> 
>> Why does it returned the current process ID, and not GetCurrentThread() ? 
>> 
>> 
>> -- Jean-Daniel
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
> 

-- Jean-Daniel





_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to