> This is usually due to a missing: > > using namespace lldb; > > at the top of the source file. If this is in a header file, then you will > need to prefix the type with "lldb::".
OK, so just use the standard pattern with fully qualified type in the header. Do you care about cleaning lldb::addr_t in the implementation files? > > Greg > > On Jan 16, 2013, at 11:05 AM, Pawel Wodnicki <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Quick question on using lldb::addr_t and addr_t. >> I am getting compile errors due undefined addr_t. >> The way to fix it seems simple, just change >> all the addr_t to lldb::addr_t :-). But there is >> a lot of the addr_t sprinkled around, so perhaps >> I am simply missing add_t type definition. >> Are these two types intended to be equivalent? >> >> Paweł >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > > > _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
