Agreed. Will file a bugzilla accordingly. On 2013-05-08 5:26 PM, "Greg Clayton" <[email protected]> wrote:
>My concern is that we present the most useful symbol to the user when we >stop. The disassembly is broken up as a result of the __libc_malloc >symbol. I am guessing this symbol __libc_malloc has a size of zero. When >looking up a symbol by address, we are finding "__libc_malloc" first >instead of just "malloc". We should be picking "malloc" first if it has a >valid byte size. > _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
