Thanks for the confirmation; committed in 183109. Cheers,
Dan On 2013-06-01 11:45 AM, "Ed Maste" <[email protected]> wrote: >On 31 May 2013 17:13, Malea, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hmm, so while that approach might work in this case, it won't be fun to >> maintain this correct ordering in the long run. If you have a moment, >> could you try the below fix instead? I think it's a more generic >>solution >> to the problem at hand. If it works, I will commit post haste. > >Right, I just wanted to verify that it was (only) a link ordering >problem. I can confirm that it works with your patch. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
