BTW, it is probably best to do this in the BreakpointLocationList's FindByAddress...
Jim On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:42 PM, [email protected] wrote: > That should work. We changed the address compares used in the breakpoint > location lists to use Address::ModulePointerAndOffsetLessThanFunctionObject, > but that requires the input Addresses be resolved already. That's probably > why it stopped working. It should be fine to just resolve the input address > in FindLocationIDByAddress before looking it up. > > Jim > > On Jul 15, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Michael Sartain <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Should the following work? >> >> m_break_bp_sp = m_process->GetTarget().CreateBreakpoint(break_addr, true); >> assert (m_break_bp_sp->FindLocationIDByAddress(break_addr) != >> LLDB_INVALID_BREAK_ID); >> >> The problem I'm running into is that CreateBreakpoint() is resolving the >> address: >> >> 319+> m_section_load_list.ResolveLoadAddress(addr, so_addr); >> 320| if (!so_addr.IsValid()) >> 321| { >> 322| // The address didn't resolve, so just set this as an absolute >> address >> 323| so_addr.SetOffset (addr); >> 324| } >> >> But FindLocationIDByAddress() isn't, so the address comparisons are failing >> in the FindLocationIDByAddress() routine. >> -Mike >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
