On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Greg Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> You might think about storing the breakpoint ID instead of a shared > pointer to the breakpoint. > > Can I ask why? There should only be one of these I believe. I think ThreadPlanStepRange.cpp does something similar with m_next_branch_bp_sp. Does that make sense to switch to IDs as well? Thanks Greg.
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
