On 7 January 2014 04:46, Chandler Carruth <[email protected]> wrote: > Greetings, I'm reaching out as you guys are a big subproject but I don't > know much about build infrastructure or bots over there.... > > As you may have heard on the LLVM list, we're planning to switch to use > C++11 now that 3.4 is out. The first step is establishing a new baseline of > compiler versions that are supported[1]: > > MSVC 2012 > GCC 4.7 > Clang 3.1 > > If you are helping to keep build bot infrastructure running and up-to-date, > please check the host compiler versions and reply here if you're going to > have trouble upgrading. My rough plan based on chatting with some folks is > to submit checks to cmake and configure on Monday to produce an error on > older toolchains without some flag to force old toolchain support. > > So reply to this thread if you need more time, or if all your bots are > ready-to-go! Thanks a bunch!
The FreeBSD LLDB buildbots are ready to go. (The amd64 buildbot has been failing due to LLVM test failures since mid December, but LLDB itself tests fine. FreeBSD/i386 LLDB doesn't yet work.) http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-amd64-freebsd http://llvm-amd64.freebsd.your.org:8010/builders/lldb-i386-freebsd The Debian Clang buildbot claims to use a recent ToT clang, so it should be fine. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian-clang The other Linux buildbot and the Darwin buildbot seem to be broken at the moment. http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-linux http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-darwin11 In any case, LLDB has already required C++11 for some time. -Ed _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
