Hi again, Keno - what revision of lldb are you synched to? I recall seeing some platform changes go in today, I think after my last sync/build.
Thanks, Todd On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote: > FWIW - I just tried this on Ubuntu 14.04 with a build at r213575 (earlier > today): > > tfiala@tfiala2:/mnt/ssd/work/macosx.sync/mbp-git/build-debug$ bin/lldb > (lldb) file /bin/ls > Current executable set to '/bin/ls' (x86_64). > (lldb) run > Process 20313 launching > Process 20313 launched: '/bin/ls' (x86_64) > Process 20313 stopped > * thread #1: tid = 20313, 0x00007fdaa88d42d0, name = 'ls', stop reason = trace > frame #0: 0x00007fdaa88d42d0 > error: No such process > 2014-06-29-23_22_22 CMakeFiles examples rules.ninja > 2014-06-29-23_22_40 cmake_install.cmake include share > bin CPackConfig.cmake lib test > build.ninja CPackSourceConfig.cmake lldb-test-traces tools > cmake docs LLVMBuild.cmake unittests > CMakeCache.txt DummyConfigureOutput projects utils > Process 20313 exited with status = 0 (0x00000000) > (lldb) > > That seemed to work, but is Ubuntu 14.04 vs. 12.04. > > -Todd > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Can you send me your /bin/ls? (Direct send to me, might need to .tar.gz >> it). I can see if we're identifying it correctly at the object file level. >> >> With recent platform additions, we may have borked something. >> >> Have you tried running the tests on your end? There are a few tests in >> test/functionalities/object-file that will verify if we're parsing the >> object files correctly. >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Keno Fischer < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> This is on >>> >>> 64-bit Ubuntu 12.04.4 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-61-generic x86_64) >>> >>> I started a bisect. I can confirm that this worked on Feb 28 (I chose >>> that arbitrarily for the start of the bisect), so it must have broken since. >>> >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Keno, >>>> >>>> Which Linux distribution and bitness (64/32) are you on? >>>> >>>> I've seen similar behavior when platforms or object files >>>> inappropriately identify (or mis-identify) which files they can do >>>> something with. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:26 PM, Keno Fischer < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I just rebuilt lldb on a linux machine (usually I'm on mac), and I'm >>>>> seeing this (for all programs on the machine). Has anybody seen this >>>>> before (before I dive into debugging)? >>>>> >>>>> >usr/bin/lldb /bin/ls >>>>> error: '/bin/ls' doesn't contain the architecture x86_64 >>>>> >>>>> Keno >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> lldb-dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180 >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180 >> > > > > -- > Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180 > -- Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
