So if I'm doing this for local Linux llgs-based debugging, I would want to
do the same thing on the PlatformLinux side. Is there any significance to
the name? For example, I'm using this code right now:
ListenerSP listener_sp (new Listener("lldb.*PlatformLinux*.attach.hijack")
-Todd
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote:
> Ok, thanks.
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Greg Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> It will get all process events delivered to it (like the initial
>> eStateStopped event) to make sure the attach succeeded. The it will likely
>> re-post the event after unhijacking the process events so LLDB knows about
>> it.
>>
>> Attach either succeeds or fails immediately (when attaching to a pid or
>> name), or waits when attaching to the next process by name. This can be
>> interrupted by CTRL+C and there is some logic that deals with that.
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> > On Aug 19, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Todd Fiala <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey guys,
>> >
>> > In the local MacOSX debugging case when PlatformDarwin::Attach () is
>> eventually called, what is this piece of code really doing?
>> >
>> > ListenerSP listener_sp (new
>> Listener("lldb.PlatformDarwin.attach.hijack"));
>> > attach_info.SetHijackListener(listener_sp);
>> > process_sp->HijackProcessEvents(listener_sp.get());
>> >
>> > What will be that hijacker's responsibility?
>> >
>> > Thanks!
>> > --
>> > Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] |
>> 650-943-3180
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180
>
--
Todd Fiala | Software Engineer | [email protected] | 650-943-3180
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
