On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Greg Clayton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Oct 10, 2014, at 1:05 PM, Philippe Lavoie < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I noticed that by default lldb does not read .debug_frame section to > unwind frames but relies instead on .eh_frame . > > > > Is there a way to fallback to reading .debug_frame? > > Not currently. Most compilers (gcc _and_ clang) put the same old stuff in > .debug_frame as they do in .eh_frame, so we haven't had to use .debug_frame > over .eh_frame yet. What compiler are using that is putting different (more > complete) info in .debug_frame vs .eh_frame? > > > What about about C or C++ program compiled with -fno-exceptions? They will fall back to the UnwindAssembly way even if the .debug_frame is present right?
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
