http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22177
Zachary Turner <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] Component|All Bugs |All Bugs Assignee|[email protected] |[email protected] Product|lldb |lld Summary|LLDB expression evaluator |LLD does not generate a |does not demangle C++ names |symbol table on Windows |on Windows | --- Comment #2 from Zachary Turner <[email protected]> --- So the problem is not that it can't demangle names. In fact, it can demangle names just fine. You can see it demangling main. And if you change the signature of main in expr_test.cpp to int main(int, char**) then you will get this from LLDB (note that I'm using a PE file here, generated with -fuse-ld=lld): d:\testexe>d:\src\llvm\build\ninja\bin\lldb (lldb) file expr_test.exe Current executable set to 'expr_test.exe' (i386). (lldb) p main (int (*)(int, char **)) $0 = 0x00415020 But it still can't handle foo even LLD's debug info. The problem seems to be that LLD isn't building the symbol table correctly. d:\testexe>d:\src\llvm\build\ninja\bin\llvm-readobj.exe --symbols expr_test.exe File: expr_test.exe Format: COFF-i386 Arch: i386 AddressSize: 32bit Symbols [ ] I don't know what I'm supposed to see here, but I would expect to see "main" and "foo" in that list in some form or another. I guess it just happens to be finding main because it's the entry point, so we got lucky. This sounds like an issue for someone who works on LLD. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
