On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:20:14PM +0000, Zachary Turner wrote: > > > a) they should be explicitly marked as interface tests. > > What's the decorator for this? > > There's not one currently.
Will there be? > > > d) Results of these interface tests should also not be *verified* by the > > > use of self.expect, but itself through the API. (Relying on the text to > > be > > > formatted a specific way is obviously problematic, as opposed to just > > > verifying the actual state of the debugger) > > > > How do you rely "on the text to be formatted a specific way"? > > Quick example: One of the most common patterns in the test are to do some > things, print a backtrace, and run a regex against the output of the > backtrace. I've found at least 3 different examples of how this causes > things to fail on Windows: Oh, I misunderstood your point. You're saying the existing tests rely "on the text to be formatted a specific way". Right. I was asking how you *could* make sure the output was formatted a specific way using the Python API. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev