Greg Clayton wrote: > Yes I have seen a bunch of problems like this on linux due to types being > incomplete in the debug info (my guess). But I would like to verify that the > manual DWARF indexing isn't to blame for this. We have great accelerator > tables that the clang makes for us that actually have all of the info we need > to find types and functions quickly, whereas all other platforms must run > SymbolFileDWARF::Index() to manually index the DWARF.
I'm on OS X, so none of this applies? > I should be able to tell if you can send me an ELF file and say where you > were and wait wasn't showing up correctly (which variables) in an exact code > context (which file + line or exact line in a function). Then I can verify > that SymbolFileDWARF::Index() is correctly indexing things so that we can > find types and functions when we need them. I've been mulling over this problem: do you want to be able to run the Mach-O, or do you just want to inspect it? The transitive closure of the dependencies is atleast 30 .dylibs, and I can't take out that much IP. So what are we looking for exactly? Thanks. Ram _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
