Here's the status for my builds so far.

clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-x86_64-linux-gnu-debian8.tar.xz (sha1sum: 
2b546efa5bab19d6711771ef31711d07b4a3f23f)
        Native:
                All ok
        Cross compiling to various MIPS targets:
                16 out of 23 configs passed
                1 out of the remaining 7 failed a small number of tests with a 
timeout. I expect these will pass when I re-run them.
                Remaining 6 configs still running...

clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mips-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: 
b46221e1bb54255e9e060f06bb72bb2ba630ff15)
        Failed to run check-all due to tsan'd libc++ build failing
                PR26278 - My fix for this was committed just after the rc2 tag 
so in order to get some check-all results, I applied those four patches 
(r25966[1456]) and re-ran check-all.
                PR26369 - Several failures related to the lack of -latomic 
which is needed for 64-bit atomics.
                PR26476 - One new failure in libc++ (I probably just missed it 
amongst the others). Apparently std::regex_traits says that '-' doesn't belong 
to the 'w' class but only on big-endian.
                check-all appears to hang at 99%. I'll look into this.
        LNT (using the clean rc2)
                1 of 3 passed successfully, the other two are still running

clang+llvm-3.8.0-rc2-mipsel-linux-gnu.tar.xz (sha1sum: 
9f89cccfdb5cf6a27138b84a631003c4a04f456d)
        Build almost ok. I only have failures related to PR26369.
        LNT just started.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of Hans
> Wennborg via lldb-dev
> Sent: 02 February 2016 21:16
> To: release-test...@lists.llvm.org
> Cc: llvm-dev; cfe-dev; openmp-dev (openmp-...@lists.llvm.org); LLDB Dev
> Subject: [lldb-dev] [3.8 Release] RC2 has been tagged
> 
> Dear testers,
> 
> Release Candidate 2 has just been tagged [1]. Please build, test, and
> upload to the sftp.
> 
> I know there are still outstanding issues from RC1, but there have
> been a lot of merges going into the branch and I think it's time for
> another round of RC testing.
> 
> This RC comes a little behind schedule, sorry about that, but I'm
> still optimistic about hitting the target of releasing towards the end
> of February.
> 
> Thanks for all the work you've put into this release so far!
> 
> Hans
> 
>  [1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-branch-commits/2016-
> February/009739.html
> _______________________________________________
> lldb-dev mailing list
> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to