On 4 July 2016 at 00:42, Robinson, Paul <paul.robin...@sony.com> wrote: > Daniel claimed it was not different, even though he proposed the text. > I think it is better, as "egregious" (even though it is qualitative) > helps identify what "rare" circumstances would come under the policy. > As a non-lawyer I do think it's different.
I personally agree with you, both on helping identify "rare" (as what, not when), and for easing non-lawyers minds. cheers, --renato _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
