The snapshots are built with the script in utils/release/build_llvm_package.bat. It's currently passing -DLLDB_RELOCATABLE_PYTHON=1 and -DPYTHON_HOME=<path>.
I was planning on trying to build a new snapshot today and can add -DLLDB_DEFAULT_PYTHON_HOME if you think that will help. On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> wrote: > So it sounds like you're saying that in order for Python support to work as > part of an LLDB shipped in the installer, we need to do set 3 variables at > CMake time. > > 1) -DLLDB_RELOCATABLE_PYTHON=TRUE > 2) -DPYTHON_HOME = <path-to-python-3-5-on-build-machine> > 3) -DLLDB_DEFAULT_PYTHON_HOME=TRUE > > Now because of #3, the lldb shipped in the installer will use the PYTHONHOME > system environment variable to locate python, which must point to a valid > Python 3.5 installation. Is this correct? > > On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:35 AM Ted Woodward <ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org> > wrote: >> >> Windows has no concept of a default python installation, and I can’t be >> sure what version of python my users have, if any, so I need to solve 2 >> problems: >> >> 1) Where is python when I’m building? >> >> 2) Where is python when I’m running? >> >> >> >> To solve #1, I set LLDB_RELOCATABLE_PYTHON to TRUE, and PYTHON_HOME to my >> python installation (on our buildbots, c:/python351). >> >> >> >> #2 only needs to be solved if the machine you’re running on doesn’t have >> the same python installation, in PYTHON_HOME above. To do that, I’ve added >> code to set a cmake path LLDB_DEFAULT_PYTHONHOME, which I pass as a macro >> down to InitializePythonHome in >> source/Plugins/ScriptInterpreter/Python/ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp, and >> call Py_SetPythonHome with it. My installations have the python dll and >> python library directory. We put the library in <install>/lib/python35 and >> the dll in <install>/bin. >> >> -- >> >> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. >> >> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a >> Linux Foundation Collaborative Project >> >> >> >> From: Zachary Turner [mailto:ztur...@google.com] >> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2016 12:40 PM >> To: Vadim Chugunov <vadi...@gmail.com> >> Cc: Reid Kleckner <r...@google.com>; Hans Wennborg <h...@chromium.org>; >> LLDB <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>; Ted Woodward <ted.woodw...@codeaurora.org> >> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-3.8.1 prebuilt binary for windows7 >> >> >> >> I believe the way to fix this is going to be building LLDB for the >> installer with LLDB_RELOCATABLE_PYTHON=1 at CMake time >> >> >> >> +Ted, since I believe he is one of the few people currently using this >> flag. >> >> On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:36 AM Vadim Chugunov <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> This is still broken in the October snapshot. Do you know which script >> is used to build the Windows installer? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >> I think it is a problem with the way we built lldb. I will look into what >> additional steps we need to take when making the prebuilt binary so that it >> works next time. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 6:20 PM Vadim Chugunov <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Nope, that didn't help. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 5:16 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >> I may know what this is. Can you try setting PYTHONPATH though to point >> to your Python 3.5 installation though and see if it fixes it? (I don't >> think it will, but let's try anyway) >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM Vadim Chugunov <vadi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> It outputs 'c:\Program Files (x86)\LLVM\lib\site-packages', however the >> 'site-packages' directory does not exist. Nor do I see '_lldb.pyd' anywhere >> else. >> >> 'script import lldb' also fails, of course. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Zachary Turner <ztur...@google.com> >> wrote: >> >> He said he did, so I don't know. Vadim, can you elaborate? When you run >> `lldb -P` from the command line, what do you see? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 4:00 PM Reid Kleckner via lldb-dev >> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> I imagine that Hans doesn't have Python 3 installed on his system, so LLDB >> didn't autoconfigure with Python support. >> >> >> >> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:07 PM, Vadim Chugunov via lldb-dev >> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> > Does the 4.0 binary not work for you? It is the first release that >> > contains prebuilt lldb binary. >> >> >> >> Looks like the Python API is not included though. Do you know why it was >> left out? >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev