When you use process launch and a lldb-server in "platform" mode, it will try 
to launch an lldb-server in gdbserver mode for you. So you will need to debug 
the "qLaunchGDBServer" packet. It will spawn a "lldb-server" in gdb remote 
mode, have it bind to port zero and report back the port that it actually bound 
to, so we can then attach the the GDB server from the host computer. 

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 11:42 PM, cuibixiong <cuibixi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi 
>       
>       I don’t launch lldb-server which already debugging a program, just use 
> "lldb-server platform —listen *:3333 —server” on Qemu armhf for Debian 6.0
> 
> Best Regards
> —cuibixiong
> 
> 发件人: Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com <mailto:clayb...@gmail.com>>
> 日期: 2017年10月31日 星期二 23:15
> 至: Tatyana Krasnukha <tatyana.krasnu...@synopsys.com 
> <mailto:tatyana.krasnu...@synopsys.com>>
> 抄送: cuibixiong <cuibixi...@gmail.com <mailto:cuibixi...@gmail.com>>, 
> "lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>" 
> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>>
> 主题: Re: [lldb-dev] did anyone konw LLDB support lldb + openocd to run 
> dotest.py in bare board like ARM or other non-x86 architecture?
> 
> If you are launching your lldb-server and it is already debugging a program 
> you don't use "process launch", you use "process attach" if you are connected 
> to your platform. 
> 
> It isn't recommended to use "remote-gdb-server" platform directly. 
> "remote-linux" uses "remote-gdb-server" underneath it, but it also overrides 
> a bunch of other platform functions that you need in order to debug 
> correctly. So use "remote-linux".
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 28, 2017, at 3:15 AM, Tatyana Krasnukha via lldb-dev 
>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>> 
>> I guess 2 ways of remote debugging:
>> “remote-linux” platform with process attach instead of process launch
>> “remote-gdb-server” platform with process launch.
>> As I understood, both of them use lldb-server.
>>  
>> To execute tests remotely you may run dotest.py with according options 
>> (platform-name and platfrom-url).
>>  
>> As for openocd and other gdb servers, there is no way to use them for remote 
>> testing. I haven’t found, at least.
>>  
>> Thanks,
>> Tatyana
>>  
>> From: cuibixiong [mailto:cuibixi...@gmail.com <mailto:cuibixi...@gmail.com>] 
>> Sent: Saturday, 28 October, 2017 12:40 PM
>> To: Tatyana Krasnukha <tatyana.krasnu...@synopsys.com 
>> <mailto:tatyana.krasnu...@synopsys.com>>
>> Cc: lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
>> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] did anyone konw LLDB support lldb + openocd to run 
>> dotest.py in bare board like ARM or other non-x86 architecture?
>>  
>> Hi 
>>  
>>               You mean should use “platform select remote-linux” ? I use it 
>> but also report error: unable to launch a GDB server on 'debian-armhf.""'
>>  
>>               in-addition, you said gdb-server is “GNU GDB server” or just 
>> lldb-server services ?
>>  
>> Best Regards
>> —cuibixiong
>>  
>> 发件人: Tatyana Krasnukha <tatyana.krasnu...@synopsys.com 
>> <mailto:tatyana.krasnu...@synopsys.com>>
>> 日期: 2017年10月27日 星期五 21:53
>> 至: cuibixiong <cuibixi...@gmail.com <mailto:cuibixi...@gmail.com>>
>> 抄送: "lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>" 
>> <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>>
>> 主题: RE: [lldb-dev] did anyone konw LLDB support lldb + openocd to run 
>> dotest.py in bare board like ARM or other non-x86 architecture?
>>  
>> It seems that ‘process launch’ tries to launch gdb-server that is already 
>> started manually, try to attach instead.
>>  
>> I also met ‘remote-gdb-server’ platform, maybe it fits your goal better? 
>> Didn’t you try to do something like this?
>> dotest.py --platform-name=remote-gdb-server 
>> --platfrom-url=connect://hostname:port <connect://hostname:port> 
>> --arch=architecture ...
>>  
>> From: lldb-dev [mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org 
>> <mailto:lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org>] On Behalf Of cui bixiong via 
>> lldb-dev
>> Sent: Friday, 27 October, 2017 9:41 AM
>> To: Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com <mailto:clayb...@gmail.com>>
>> Cc: lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [lldb-dev] did anyone konw LLDB support lldb + openocd to run 
>> dotest.py in bare board like ARM or other non-x86 architecture?
>>  
>> Hi :
>>  
>>     I build a armhf qemu enviroment to test ARM lldb + lldb-server 
>> testsuite.  source code base on LLVM + LLDB + LLD + CLANG formal release 
>> 5.0.0.
>>  
>>     Target: lldb-server platform --listen *:3333 --server
>>  
>>     Host :  
>>  
>>     (lldb) platform select remote-linux
>>     Platform: remote-linux
>>     Connected: no
>>     (lldb) platform connect connect://0.0.0.0:3333 
>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__0.0.0.0-3A3333&d=DwMFaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=yfnu24japkhNGh-WqJObHXmH3mINtC_2FO828lrNpM0&m=uN6_uN-vbhkIBUYfgaia_IIUZ-KsQTwmy_orALFBdnw&s=gG9WkTsbhG3Ylm1kB0uyHUObWovqkIKU8ax052TDtxY&e=>
>>     Platform: remote-linux
>>     Triple: arm-*-linux-gnueabihf
>>     OS Version: 3.2.0 (3.2.0-4-vexpress)
>>     Kernel: #1 SMP Debian 3.2.51-1
>>     Hostname: debian-armhf.""
>>     Connected: yes
>>     WorkingDir: /root
>>     (lldb) file ./hello.exe
>>     Current executable set to './hello.exe' (arm).
>>     (lldb) log enable gdb-remote packets
>>     (lldb) process launch
>>     history[1] tid=0x6192 <   1> send packet: +
>>     history[2] tid=0x6192 <  19> send packet: $QStartNoAckMode#b0
>>     history[3] tid=0x6192 <   1> read packet: +
>>     history[4] tid=0x6192 <   6> read packet: $OK#9a
>>     history[5] tid=0x6192 <   1> send packet: +
>>     history[6] tid=0x6192 <  13> send packet: $qHostInfo#9b
>>     history[7] tid=0x6192 < 297> read packet:                  
>> $triple:61726d2d2d6c696e75782d676e75656162696866;ptrsize:4;distribution_id:64656269616e;watchpoint_exceptions_received:before;endian:little;os_version:3.2.0;os_build:332e322e302d342d7665787072657373;os_kernel:233120534d502044656269616e20332e322e35312d31;hostname:64656269616e2d61726d68662e2222;#1a
>>     history[8] tid=0x6192 <  18> send packet: $qGetWorkingDir#91
>>     history[9] tid=0x6192 <  14> read packet: $2f726f6f74#a4
>>     history[10] tid=0x6192 <  19> send packet: $qQueryGDBServer#cb
>>     history[11] tid=0x6192 <   7> read packet: $E04#a9
>>     history[12] tid=0x6192 <  73> send packet: 
>> $qModuleInfo:2e2f68656c6c6f2e657865;61726d2d2d6c696e75782d656162696866#b7
>> history[13] tid=0x6192 <   7> read packet: $E03#a8
>> history[14] tid=0x6192 <  69> send packet: 
>> $qModuleInfo:6c6962632e736f2e36;61726d2d2d6c696e75782d656162696866#7b
>>     history[15] tid=0x6192 <   7> read packet: $E03#a8
>> <  36> send packet: $qLaunchGDBServer;host:mtkslt202;#b1
>>     error: unable to launch a GDB server on 'debian-armhf.""'
>>  
>>      i show host and port is uncorrect, is it a bug?
>>  
>>  
>> Best Regards
>> --cuibixiong
>>  
>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:04 PM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:clayb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>  
>>>> On Oct 24, 2017, at 12:02 AM, cui bixiong <cuibixi...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:cuibixi...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>  
>>>> Hi
>>>>  
>>>>     sorry, i'm confuse, in my mind, lldb-server maybe like gdb-server, 
>>>> running on Linux-like platform  listening RSP command which send form gdb 
>>>> and use ptrace syscall to debug which you want to debug program
>>>>  
>>>>     is it support remote download to batch mode run all testsuite? 
>>>> certainly i think reset baseboard is very important feature too,  but in 
>>>> lldb-server maybe not support currently i guess.
>>>  
>>> Yes lldb-server does support a full connection to a remote OS. On 
>>> baseboards you are typically debugging the entire OS so lldb-server won't 
>>> work because you have to OS to run it in the background. Supporting the 
>>> test suite on baseboards will take some effort.
>>>>  
>>>> Best Regards
>>>> --cuibixiong
>>>>  
>>>> On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Greg Clayton <clayb...@gmail.com 
>>>> <mailto:clayb...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> > On Oct 22, 2017, at 6:21 AM, cuibixiong via lldb-dev 
>>>>> > <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Hi
>>>>> >
>>>>> >       did anyone konw LLDB support lldb + openocd to run dotest.py in 
>>>>> > bare board like ARM or other non-x86 architecture?
>>>>> 
>>>>> We run the test suite on iOS devices using the platform stuff. This 
>>>>> requires a running lldb-server on the remote system, so we only have the 
>>>>> test suite running when we have the lldb-server running in platform mode 
>>>>> on the other side. For this to work with baseboards, we would need the 
>>>>> JTAG box to respond to many GDB remote protocol packets that "lldb-server 
>>>>> platform" implements. I am sure for baseboards the test suite would need 
>>>>> to be modified. A few ideas there:
>>>>> - Have the test suite watch for a triple with no os (like 
>>>>> "arm64-none-none") and have it go into a baseboard mode
>>>>> - Many tests that might rely on writing to files, reading from files for 
>>>>> stdin, and others, would need to be skipped in this mode
>>>>> - Any tests that build and debug shared libraries would either need to be 
>>>>> modified to build multiple static binaries or skipped
>>>>> - We might need to make a Bareboard platform and would load the ELF files 
>>>>> into memory instead of copying them over like the current platforms do
>>>>> 
>>>>> So there would be quite a lot of modifications required to get the test 
>>>>> suite running. We will be happy to help you if you choose to try this.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Greg Clayton
>>>>> 
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Best Regards
>>>>> > —cuibixiong
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > lldb-dev mailing list
>>>>> > lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
>>>>> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev 
>>>>> > <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__lists.llvm.org_cgi-2Dbin_mailman_listinfo_lldb-2Ddev&d=DwMFaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=yfnu24japkhNGh-WqJObHXmH3mINtC_2FO828lrNpM0&m=uN6_uN-vbhkIBUYfgaia_IIUZ-KsQTwmy_orALFBdnw&s=XumZaATwR447RuANlMXxfm7a3f09ZfjC48JPk393PvE&e=>
>>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>>  
>> _______________________________________________
>> lldb-dev mailing list
>> lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org <mailto:lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev 
>> <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev>

_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to