I've created a patch implementing this in <https://reviews.llvm.org/D43333>. Let me know what you think of it (particularly of the parts that will become the "stable API").
On 14 February 2018 at 18:43, Greg Clayton <[email protected]> wrote: > I second Jim's idea for a static function on SBDebugger that returns a > SBStructuredData > >> On Feb 14, 2018, at 10:31 AM, Jim Ingham via lldb-dev >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The idea of having a static function in SBDebugger that returns lldb >> configuration information seems good to me. >> >> Having the API return an SBStructuredData with the full configuration >> information seems like a pretty future-proof way to do this. I can't see >> that this data will get sufficiently large that consing up the whole set of >> config options to answer a single question is going to be a problem, and the >> info is constant for the run of lldb, so you can cache the result. >> >> Jim >> >> >>> On Feb 5, 2018, at 4:01 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hello all, >>> >>> In <https://reviews.llvm.org/D42145> we have a feature that only works >>> when lldb was built with xml support. To test this, we need the test >>> to know whether we were build with xml support. >>> >>> The typical llvm solution would be to generate some dotest equivalent >>> of lit.site.cfg at build time, which we could then load from the test >>> and query for build settings. >>> >>> However, it has occurred to me that the information about various >>> build properties (xml suport, libedit support, list of llvm targets we >>> support) is something that could be useful to other liblldb clients as >>> well. So, another way of exposing this would be to have a function >>> (maybe a static function on SBDebugger ?) that the test can call and >>> get the required information that way. >>> >>> Do you have any thoughts on how this should be handled? Or maybe know >>> of an existing way that we could check this information already? >>> >>> regards, >>> pavel >>> _______________________________________________ >>> lldb-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev >> >> _______________________________________________ >> lldb-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev > _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
