On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 11:26 AM, Jim Ingham <jing...@apple.com> wrote: > It sounds like we timing out based on the whole test class, not the > individual tests? If you're worried about test failures not hanging up the > test suite the you really want to do the latter. > > These are all tests that contain 5 or more independent tests. That's > probably why they are taking so long to run. > > I don't object to having fairly long backstop timeouts, though I agree with > Pavel that we should choose something reasonable based on the slowest running > tests just so some single error doesn't cause test runs to just never > complete, making analysis harder. >
Vedant (cc:ed) is going to take a look at this as he's babysitting the bots for the week. I'll defer the call to him. _______________________________________________ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
