We're using it with Eclipse and Eclipse based product, so I'd like to
keep as well! :-)...
Zdenek
On 7/2/19 12:21 AM, Ted Woodward via lldb-dev wrote:
We’re using lldb-mi to debug with Eclipse in the Hexagon SDK. I’d
really like to keep it! 😊
Ted
*From:* lldb-dev <lldb-dev-boun...@lists.llvm.org> *On Behalf Of
*Jonas Devlieghere via lldb-dev
*Sent:* Monday, July 1, 2019 5:09 PM
*To:* LLDB <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org>
*Subject:* [EXT] [lldb-dev] [RFC] Removing lldb-mi
Hi everyone,
After long consideration, I want to propose removing lldb-mi from the
repository. It is basically unmaintained, doesn't match the LLDB code
style, and worst of all the tests are unreliable if not already
disabled. As far as I can tell it's missing core functionality to be
usable from something like say emacs.
Thanks,
Jonas
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev
