On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 1:44 AM Raphael “Teemperor” Isemann via
lldb-dev <lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I have to admit I’m getting a bit confused lately where to put tests. 
> Especially for testing LLDB commands it’s not obvious where to put files as 
> we test some commands directly in the top-level test folder (e.g. quit, help, 
> settings), some are in /functionalities with a _command suffix (e.g. target), 
> some are in /functionalities without any suffix (e.g. register), some tests 
> are split by subcommand (process, frame) and some are in the top-level folder 
> with the _command prefix (e.g. expression). This makes it hard to figure out 
> where to find or create tests for specific commands. Also setting a 
> LIT_FILTER for jus testing CommandObject* changes is not possible.
>
> I would propose we restructure at least the command tests into 
> “test/commands/${command_name}/${subcommand_name_or_functionality}/“ such as 
> “test/commands/process/launch”. The LIT_FILTER for these things would be 
> “commands/“.
>
> I don’t see any disadvantages from this as
> * downstreams usually doesn’t fiddle around with the existing tests, so there 
> should hopefully be no merge conflicts from this.
> * git blame can handle this change as we only move files/directories and 
> don’t touch their contents.
> * it’s very little work to actually do this.
>
> I’m not sure if there is a need to restructure any other tests but I think if 
> there are no objections in this thread, then I assume everyone can just take 
> a few seconds and restructure their own tests.
>

+1
_______________________________________________
lldb-dev mailing list
lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Reply via email to