On 7/20/07, Christian Floerkemeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pro: > - we can generate code and the appropriate documentation from the > XML description > > Con: > - LLRPdef.xml might become a bit overloaded with documentation. > - Might not be useful for all implementations (I think it would at > least help for an c# and java impl) > > Not sure whether this was already considered earlier and rejected. > > - Christian > >
I for one would welcome such a patch :-) This would be a big help in the Perl documented-oriented approach interactively generating instances of LLRP.xsd . Good XML editors will reveal this text in useful contexts. Do you know if XML editors typically support XHTML markup in annotations? If so that is probably what we should use for specifying emphasis, line breaks, etc. -- John. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
