> Post a trace from the online decoder, and we should be able to help you.
I've made a mistake in describing what I'm doing, it seems. Although I'm playing with Rifidi because it seems generally better and isn't linked to any specific vendor, the only client examples I have are vendor specific, and they'll only talk to their own readers and reader simulators. On port 1005. The clients do autodiscovery and won't let me talk to Rifidi. So I do have a 52K PCAP file that I can mail if anyone wants to have a look but the ports are wrong for the online decoder, and it seems pretty clear that there's funny vendor specific stuff going on- manual decoding is error prone, but the initial packet sent from client to reader is only 114 bytes and I've taken a fair length of time decoding and checking it, especially around the stuff that doesn't make sense. I was worried that my understanding was way off, so it's reassuring having other people say it seems odd. > You are still welcome, but you will probably find that you are quickly > kicking yourself as the bottom layer of the .NET toolkit is likely to be > a total duplication of effort with one here. I would urge you to > consider keeping a layer that becomes the LTKDotNet layer and then > trying to add commercial value above that layer. The problem is that my boss isn't happy to have open source stuff because of the issues of copyright breach on the one hand and the perceived requirement to open source anything that in any way uses open source stuff. I went down the route a couple of years back to use a lovely library of little utility routines and even had email assurances from one of the lead contributors that the license it was under (LGPL) allowed us to call the libraries without opening our code. Didn't help, so I have to periodically reinvent the wheel. Since there's substantial cost to re-inventing the wheel, I'll make another attempt. If I joined the dotnet effort what would be the implication? I assume the toolkit will be done as a seperate DLL or assembly that can be called by our closed code? -- Dr. Craig Graham, Software Engineer Advanced Analysis and Integration Limited, UK. http://www.aail.co.uk/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
