On Dec 6, 2007 9:46 PM, Christian Floerkemeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Will you commit the change you recommended below together with the proposed > changes to llrpdef.xml? > > - Christian > Sure. The recommendation you make on llrpdef.xml is right, I think. Somewhat relevant, LTK-Perl is more lenient on XML instances to encode than the LLRP.xsd implies. Integer values are accepted in place of enumeration strings. But the output is always the enumeration strings. If we expect to see long lists of these, I think it would be a good idea to replace EPCGlobalClass2Gen2 with C1G2 since it is just as clear, unlikely to collide, and would save a lot of space in the XML output. But I suspect that suggestion might meet resistance as not cleaving to the spec. -- John. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
