We were not planning to implement (or make any API changes) at this
time.

Paul

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Basil Gasser
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 9:48 AM
To: LLRP Toolkit Development List
Subject: [ltk-d] inconsitency between spec and llrpdef
(CLIENT_REQUEST_OP etal)

The pdf specification 
(http://www.epcglobalinc.org/standards/llrp/llrp_1_0_1-standard-20070813
.pdf) 
contains two message (CLIENT_REQUEST_OP and CLIENT_REQUEST_OP_RESPONSE, 
see 11.1.11 et seq.)but those do not appear in the latest llrpdef xml. 
Further, there is an llrp capabilities field called 
SupportsClientRequestOpSpec which references to these messages. Further,

the AccessCommand Parameter (11.2.1.2) may have a ClientRequestOpSpec 
Parameter (11.2.1.2.1) which again does not appear in the xml.

I guess that either they have to be deleted from the spec or added to 
the llrpdef.xml

best.
Basil

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel

Reply via email to