Paul,
I assume you are refering to the case where a custom extension element is
used in an LTK-XML message that has not been defined in a corresponding
"extensionDef.xml" via the "allowedIn" construct. Is that correct?
In LTKJava, such an LTK-XML message will currently get validated against the
schema due to the <xs:any ... in LLRP.xsd but since LTKJava does not know
about the extension, the content is never processed. I guess it would be
appropriate to generate at least a warning message. How are the other
implementations handling this issue?
- Christian
_____
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Dietrich
Sent: Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 18:12
To: LLRP Toolkit Development List
Subject: [ltk-d] Java conversion from XML to binary
I noticed that when I convert an XML message to binary, it ignores the
custom extension elements. Should this be the behavior or should it error
on the packet?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel
