On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Chris Delaney <[email protected]> wrote:
> John,
>
> I've got a pretty hard stop early next week. At that point whatever state the 
> schemas are in is pretty much how they'll stay. That said, if there is an 
> elegant solution available via W3C, I'm all for finding it. I completely 
> agree that the current distinction between core and extension parameters is 
> pleasing and should be preserved if possible.
>
> Do you know of an appropriate forum to pose this question? I feel like I'm at 
> most informed, so if you have any contacts or thoughts, please pull them in 
> to the discussion! I agree that there should be a way to do this, so 
> hopefully we're just missing something... But absent an elegant method, a big 
> fat comment in the XSD would also work for me.
>
> Thanks,
>
> C
>

Well that's probably not enough time to work though this.

So I say just put in your change for now unless the Java guys object.
It doesn't really hurt anything and we can clean it up later.

I have a vague memory that the Java guys actually process the XSD so
this could be bad for them.

Is that true?

-- John.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OpenSolaris 2009.06 is a cutting edge operating system for enterprises 
looking to deploy the next generation of Solaris that includes the latest 
innovations from Sun and the OpenSource community. Download a copy and 
enjoy capabilities such as Networking, Storage and Virtualization. 
Go to: http://p.sf.net/sfu/opensolaris-get
_______________________________________________
llrp-toolkit-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/llrp-toolkit-devel

Reply via email to