================ @@ -1841,14 +1867,112 @@ createMapInfoOp(fir::FirOpBuilder &builder, mlir::Location loc, llvm::cast<mlir::omp::PointerLikeType>(retTy).getElementType()); mlir::omp::MapInfoOp op = builder.create<mlir::omp::MapInfoOp>( - loc, retTy, baseAddr, varType, varPtrPtr, members, bounds, + loc, retTy, baseAddr, varType, varPtrPtr, members, membersIndex, bounds, builder.getIntegerAttr(builder.getIntegerType(64, false), mapType), builder.getAttr<mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKindAttr>(mapCaptureType), - builder.getStringAttr(name)); + builder.getStringAttr(name), builder.getBoolAttr(partialMap)); return op; } +int findComponenetMemberPlacement( + const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *dTypeSym, + const Fortran::semantics::Symbol *componentSym) { + int placement = -1; + if (const auto *derived{ ---------------- ergawy wrote:
Any reason not to use: `if (const auto *derived = ....)` instead? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81511 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits