dpaoliello wrote: > So your use-case is basically equivalent to using llvm-dlltool, except not > using the text parser?
Yep. > If this is actually enough to make Rust targets usable, then I guess we could > consider it, but the fixes aren't structured in a way to make it obvious this > won't impact non-ARM64EC targets. That's fair enough. @cjacek you have more experience in this area than I do - what's your confidence level with backporting these changes? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/84590 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
