topperc wrote: > I'm not strongly opposed to this or anything, but it feels questionable to be > doing a backport to change the target-feature syntax. My understand is that > these are purely internal names. This isn't a documented public interface.
It isn't documented, but some users were using `-Xclang -target-feature -Xclang -unaligned-scalar-mem` with clang 17 to get this functionality. -mno-strict-align does not exist in clang 17. I'm going to experiment with reworking this patch to make `-Xclang -target-feature -Xclang -unaligned-scalar-mem` work and also leave `fast-unaligned-access` working to cover both scalar and vector. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92143 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
