MaskRay wrote:

There is a bitcode wrapper (see discussions at 
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86847), but I agree that discarding `.llvm.lto` is 
better since concatenated `.llvm.lto` does not reflect the `ld.lld -r 
<semantics-affecting-options>` semantics.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92825
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to