================
@@ -1819,6 +1822,22 @@ detail::ConversionPatternRewriterImpl
&ConversionPatternRewriter::getImpl() {
return *impl;
}
+void ConversionPatternRewriter::setCurrentTypeConverter(
+ const TypeConverter *converter) {
+ impl->currentTypeConverter = converter;
+}
+
+const TypeConverter *
+ConversionPatternRewriter::getCurrentTypeConverter() const {
+ return impl->currentTypeConverter;
+}
+
+LogicalResult ConversionPatternRewriter::getAdapterOperands(
----------------
ftynse wrote:
Nit: can we agree on Adapter/Adaptor spelling? E.g., we already have
`OpAdaptor`.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93412
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
