================
@@ -85,67 +135,227 @@ class OMPMapInfoFinalizationPass
       descriptor = alloca;
     }
 
+    return descriptor;
+  }
+
+  /// Simple function that will generate a FIR operation accessing
+  /// the descriptors base address (BoxOffsetOp) and then generate a
+  /// MapInfoOp for it, the most important thing to note is that
+  /// we normally move the bounds from the descriptor map onto the
+  /// base address map.
+  mlir::omp::MapInfoOp getBaseAddrMap(mlir::Value descriptor,
+                                      mlir::OperandRange bounds,
+                                      int64_t mapType,
+                                      fir::FirOpBuilder &builder) {
+    mlir::Location loc = descriptor.getLoc();
     mlir::Value baseAddrAddr = builder.create<fir::BoxOffsetOp>(
         loc, descriptor, fir::BoxFieldAttr::base_addr);
 
     // Member of the descriptor pointing at the allocated data
-    mlir::Value baseAddr = builder.create<mlir::omp::MapInfoOp>(
+    return builder.create<mlir::omp::MapInfoOp>(
         loc, baseAddrAddr.getType(), descriptor,
         mlir::TypeAttr::get(llvm::cast<mlir::omp::PointerLikeType>(
                                 fir::unwrapRefType(baseAddrAddr.getType()))
                                 .getElementType()),
-        baseAddrAddr, /*members=*/mlir::SmallVector<mlir::Value>{},
-        /*member_index=*/mlir::DenseIntElementsAttr{}, op.getBounds(),
-        builder.getIntegerAttr(builder.getIntegerType(64, false),
-                               op.getMapType().value()),
+        baseAddrAddr, mlir::SmallVector<mlir::Value>{},
+        mlir::DenseIntElementsAttr{}, bounds,
+        builder.getIntegerAttr(builder.getIntegerType(64, false), mapType),
         builder.getAttr<mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKindAttr>(
             mlir::omp::VariableCaptureKind::ByRef),
-        /*name=*/builder.getStringAttr(""),
-        /*partial_map=*/builder.getBoolAttr(false));
+        builder.getStringAttr("") /*name*/,
+        builder.getBoolAttr(false) /*partial_map*/);
+  }
 
-    // TODO: map the addendum segment of the descriptor, similarly to the
-    // above base address/data pointer member.
+  /// This function adjusts the member indices vector to include a new
+  /// base address member, we take the position of the descriptor in
+  /// the member indices list, which is the index data that the base
+  /// addresses index will be based off of, as the base address is
+  /// a member of the descriptor, we must also alter other members
+  /// indices in the list to account for this new addition. This
+  /// requires extending all members with -1's if the addition of
+  /// the new base address has increased the member vector past the
+  /// original size, as we must make sure all member indices are of
+  /// the same length (think rectangle matrix) due to DenseIntElementsAttr
+  /// requiring this. We also need to be aware that we are inserting
+  /// into the middle of a member index vector in some cases (i.e.
+  /// we could be accessing the member of a descriptor type with a
+  /// subsequent map, so we must be sure to adjust any of these cases
+  /// with the addition of the new base address index value).
+  void adjustMemberIndices(
+      llvm::SmallVector<llvm::SmallVector<int32_t>> &memberIndices,
+      size_t memberIndex) {
+    // Find if the descriptor member we are basing our new base address index
+    // off of has a -1 somewhere, indicating an empty index already exists (due
+    // to a larger sized member position elsewhere) which allows us to simplify
+    // later steps a little
+    auto baseAddrIndex = memberIndices[memberIndex];
+    auto *iterPos = std::find(baseAddrIndex.begin(), baseAddrIndex.end(), -1);
 
-    if (auto mapClauseOwner =
-            llvm::dyn_cast<mlir::omp::MapClauseOwningOpInterface>(target)) {
-      llvm::SmallVector<mlir::Value> newMapOps;
-      mlir::OperandRange mapOperandsArr = mapClauseOwner.getMapOperands();
+    // If we aren't at the end, as we found a -1, we can simply modify the -1
+    // to the base addresses index in the descriptor (which will always be the
+    // first member in the descriptor, so 0). If not, then we're extending the
+    // index list and have to push on a 0 and adjust the position to the new
+    // end.
+    if (iterPos != baseAddrIndex.end()) {
+      *iterPos = 0;
+    } else {
+      baseAddrIndex.push_back(0);
+      iterPos = baseAddrIndex.end();
+    }
 
-      for (size_t i = 0; i < mapOperandsArr.size(); ++i) {
-        if (mapOperandsArr[i] == op) {
-          // Push new implicit maps generated for the descriptor.
-          newMapOps.push_back(baseAddr);
+    auto isEqual = [](auto first1, auto last1, auto first2, auto last2) {
----------------
ergawy wrote:

Dejavu! Can you create a shared util of this lambda in `Utils.cpp`. The logic 
here is a bit involved and having a shared well-documented util would be nice.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96266
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to