================
@@ -1967,22 +2047,13 @@ splitCoroutine(Function &F, SmallVectorImpl<Function *> 
&Clones,
   for (DbgVariableRecord *DVR : DbgVariableRecords)
     coro::salvageDebugInfo(ArgToAllocaMap, *DVR, Shape.OptimizeFrame,
                            false /*UseEntryValue*/);
-  return Shape;
-}
 
-/// Remove calls to llvm.coro.end in the original function.
-static void removeCoroEndsFromRampFunction(const coro::Shape &Shape) {
-  if (Shape.ABI != coro::ABI::Switch) {
-    for (auto *End : Shape.CoroEnds) {
-      replaceCoroEnd(End, Shape, Shape.FramePtr, /*in resume*/ false, nullptr);
-    }
-  } else {
-    for (llvm::AnyCoroEndInst *End : Shape.CoroEnds) {
-      auto &Context = End->getContext();
-      End->replaceAllUsesWith(ConstantInt::getFalse(Context));
-      End->eraseFromParent();
-    }
+  removeCoroEndsFromRampFunction(Shape);
+
+  if (!isNoSuspendCoroutine && Shape.ABI == coro::ABI::Switch) {
----------------
yuxuanchen1997 wrote:

We currently don't propagate the attribute from the CXXRecordDecl to the LLVM 
type. We can potentially add another attribute at the coroutine function level 
if that sounds good to you. 

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/99283
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to