================ @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@ +// Test that missing-annotations detects branches that are hot, but not annotated + +// test diagnostics are issued when profiling data mis-matches annotations +// RUN: llvm-profdata merge %S/Inputs/missing-annotations-branch.proftext -o %t.profdata ---------------- ilovepi wrote:
Sure. The use of Inputs here is mostly following the convention I've seen in other tests. I'm unsure how much I can reuse the `.proftext` file between tests, so I can probably just use split-lines for those too. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96524 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list llvm-branch-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
