================
@@ -1355,6 +1355,36 @@ unsigned RelocationScanner::handleTlsRelocation(RelExpr
expr, RelType type,
return 1;
}
+ auto fatalBothAuthAndNonAuth = [&sym]() {
+ fatal("both AUTH and non-AUTH TLSDESC entries for '" + sym.getName() +
+ "' requested, but only one type of TLSDESC entry per symbol is "
+ "supported");
+ };
+
+ // Do not optimize signed TLSDESC as described in pauthabielf64 to LE/IE.
+ //
https://github.com/ARM-software/abi-aa/blob/main/pauthabielf64/pauthabielf64.rst#general-restrictions
+ // > PAUTHELF64 only supports the descriptor based TLS (TLSDESC).
+ if (oneof<R_AARCH64_AUTH_TLSDESC_PAGE, RelExpr::R_AARCH64_AUTH_TLSDESC>(
+ expr)) {
+ assert(ctx.arg.emachine == EM_AARCH64);
+ if (!sym.hasFlag(NEEDS_TLSDESC))
+ sym.setFlags(NEEDS_TLSDESC | NEEDS_TLSDESC_AUTH);
+ else if (!sym.hasFlag(NEEDS_TLSDESC_AUTH))
+ fatalBothAuthAndNonAuth();
+ sec->addReloc({expr, type, offset, addend, &sym});
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ if (sym.hasFlag(NEEDS_TLSDESC_AUTH)) {
+ assert(ctx.arg.emachine == EM_AARCH64);
+ // TLSDESC_CALL hint relocation probably should not be emitted by compiler
+ // with signed TLSDESC enabled since it does not give any value, but leave
a
+ // check against that just in case someone uses it.
+ if (expr != R_TLSDESC_CALL)
+ fatalBothAuthAndNonAuth();
----------------
ilovepi wrote:
Thanks for the clarification. I was thinking something could reach here w/
`NEEDS_TLSDESC_AUTH` set that isn't a `TLSDESC_CALL` reloc, but wouldn't be
both Auth and non-Auth (e.g. just plain invalid, rather than this flavor of
invalid).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113817
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
