ilovepi wrote: > > @nathanchance heads up; can you please test this when you get a chance > > against the Linux kernel? Looks like it's a stacked PR, where the base has > > had a revert. (Folks may be in Tokyo this week for Linux Plumbers Conf; > > expect delays) > > Thanks for the heads up! As it appears this PR is stacked on top of #170517, > which was reverted for a few issues, one of which [I > reported](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170517#issuecomment-3634886648), > I am not going to test it in its current state. @ilovepi If you want any > testing against the kernel once this change has been updated, please feel > free to ping me and I will be more than happy to do it.
This is now based on a new version of the base patch that only gets enabled when not using exceptions. The patch up the stack from this one removes that constraint. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/175817 is perhaps the better stack to try, since it has all the fixes. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/170518 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
