arichardson wrote: > > Okay it sounds like doing this based on the ABI only is the preferred > > option? We can always change it if we ever upstream hybrid support? > > I hadn't commented yet, but this is my preference. I had forgotten the > details craig raised, but I agree with them (the ABI is module-global).
Sounds good. I was going to upstream the ABI code after completing assembler support, but I'll pull out forward in my priority list. Marking this PR as draft until I've uploaded the ABI names PR. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/177249 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
