c-rhodes wrote:

> > @amy-kwan in principle this is OK to backport, but I didn't realize the 
> > patch as committed upstream has those LLVM_ABI changes ...
> 
> I added the LLVM_ABI because one of the prechecks complaint that it was 
> missing. I relayed on on this check.

I'm not familiar this annotation or whether it's correct here, but FWIW that 
precheck has since been reverted 
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178170

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/178701
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to