nikic wrote: With that in mind, I think it would make sense to also modify https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/202091 to keep the positive test, which I think is correct for that specific case, as a missed optimization opportunity.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/202092 _______________________________________________ llvm-branch-commits mailing list [email protected] https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits
