github-actions[bot] wrote:

<!--LLVM CODE FORMAT COMMENT: {clang-format}-->


:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code. 
:warning:

<details>
<summary>
You can test this locally with the following command:
</summary>

``````````bash
git-clang-format --diff origin/main HEAD --extensions cpp,h -- 
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp 
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.h 
llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVOptWInstrs.cpp --diff_from_common_commit
``````````

:warning:
The reproduction instructions above might return results for more than one PR
in a stack if you are using a stacked PR workflow. You can limit the results by
changing `origin/main` to the base branch/commit you want to compare against.
:warning:

</details>

<details>
<summary>
View the diff from clang-format here.
</summary>

``````````diff
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp 
b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp
index 9208762e8..0e69533f5 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/RISCV/RISCVISelDAGToDAG.cpp
@@ -3736,8 +3736,8 @@ static bool isRegRegScaleLoadOrStore(SDNode *User, 
SDValue Add,
     return false;
   EVT VT = cast<MemSDNode>(User)->getMemoryVT();
   if (!(VT.isScalarInteger() &&
-        (Subtarget.hasStdExtZilx() ||
-         Subtarget.hasVendorXTHeadMemIdx() || Subtarget.hasVendorXqcisls())) &&
+        (Subtarget.hasStdExtZilx() || Subtarget.hasVendorXTHeadMemIdx() ||
+         Subtarget.hasVendorXqcisls())) &&
       !((VT == MVT::f32 || VT == MVT::f64) &&
         Subtarget.hasVendorXTHeadFMemIdx()))
     return false;

``````````

</details>


https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/209420
_______________________________________________
llvm-branch-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-branch-commits

Reply via email to